A Double Case of Stalemate

One of the things I have noticed for some time now is how trends and events in the Roman Catholic Church are reflective of, and roughly parallel to, trends found in the secular society, regardless of any rigid attempts to maintain Church and State in their separate pigeonholes. This phenomenon should not be surprising to any astute observer because the Church herself is a body politic which, in her human element, consists of the same ordinary and fallible men and women who in aggregate constitute civil society as well. Secular attitudes therefore are just as apt to be found among Churchmen as Christian viewpoints permeating the legal and social order to one degree or another. This inevitable cross-pollination has worked at times for the better, but sometimes to the Church’s detriment. Regardless, I would suspect that few today would deny that the trends over the past several generations have steered in a decisively ‘progressive’ direction in both spheres, whether Church or State. And it is those ‘left of center’ trends which have brought us to this present moment which I would describe as a stalemate, be it religious, social, or political.

For the United States this stalemate could be summed up in the current war against Iran, a conflict carelessly entered into with no popular support, no apparent long term strategy, and no clearly enunciated objectives other than to topple a government inimicable to one small client state, Israel. That goal having failed spectacularly, we now find American military assets in the Gulf region under siege, a looming global economic catastrophe due to the closure of the Persian Gulf, and a colossal blow struck to America’s credibility and prestige in the world. Nor does there seem to be any face saving exit from the debacle, this asymmetric war in which the weaker party, Iran, seems to hold all the strategic cards.

Thirty-five years ago, as the Cold War was ending, America seemed to be holding all the aces. We were the sole global superpower. We controlled banking and trade via the de facto global currency, the dollar. We had peacefully defeated the Soviet empire and the time seemed ripe to beat our swords into plow-shares for a dawning era of peace, trade, and prosperity. But in fact we did just the opposite. We doubled down under the influence of war-mongering neo-cons and continued beating our plow-shares into swords. We followed the same dreary path that the British colonial empire had blazed: military adventurism, resource extraction, and power projection by means of stealth, force, or deception. In the end Britain’s wars of avarice bankrupted the exhausted empire, so the Americans simply took on the British mantle and continued down the same futile pathway. That trek dragged us through conflicts in Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Iraq, Somalia, Bosnia, Afghanistan, Iraq (again), and a Ukraine proxy war. The result has been multiple failures and embarrassments.

Continue reading

Reflections on Pope Leo XIV

We’ve had a new pope for exactly two weeks now and from comments I am seeing online, some are elated while others are positively dismayed by the choice of Robert Cardinal Prevost as the new Vicar of Christ. My first reaction was a rather personal one ~ for the first time in my life there is a pope sitting on the throne of St. Peter who is younger than I am! That in itself is a lot to digest. Popes were supposed to be old guys and suddenly this “youngster” (to me) is prancing around in the white robes and skullcap of the Petrine office. It feels like that moment when you meet your new doctor for the first time and you realize, “He looks like a teenager!”

But now that I have overcome the initial unsettling wave of chronological dysphoria, I am ready take a more balanced, objective view of the situation. Leo XIV is not only the first pope younger than myself but he is also the first American pope, Chicago born and bred, something that was considered unthinkable even a year ago. The cardinals in conclave were willing to pursue this pragmatic option in my opinion because the scandal plagued Vatican finances are in such a disheveled state that they needed someone able to tap more easily into our vast national wealth. That is not a criticism but merely an observation. Fiscally, the Vatican has its back to the wall, a problem which the Bergoglian papacy only exacerbated by purposely alienating American Catholics, who also happen to be the Vatican’s largest donor class. The hope is that Leo, as an American, can right the ship.

From the moment he first appeared on the Loggia wearing the traditional papal robes of office Leo appeared to be a conciliator. But what most struck many was his choice in taking the name Leo XIV, a clear sign that he envisions a dramatic change in direction for the Church after 12 chaotic years of “Francis the agitator.” This Leo’s predecessor, Pope Leo XIII, likewise stepped into a supercharged time of crisis for the Church back in 1878, as it came under full frontal assault by Freemasonry. The Industrial Revolution was raging like a wildfire upending Christian civilization wherever it laid down smoke belching factories and massive urban slums. Leo responded with his great encyclical Rerum Novarum which afforded dignity to the workers yet defended the rights of property, threading a common sense course between the excesses of unrestrained corporate capitalism and the equally soul deadening mosh pit of Marxist socialism.

Continue reading