The Essence of Liberty

From my perch, America at 250 seems not to be in a particularly celebratory mood, and it’s more than just being stuck in the middle of an unpopular and embarrassing war. Perhaps one reason for such meager enthusiasm on an otherwise auspicious anniversary is because many of our people have become spiritually tired and morally feeble. In his first inaugural address President George Washington stated, “there exists in the economy and course of nature, an indissoluble bond between virtue and happiness.” Novelist Michael D. O’Brien asks, “Does the erosion begin when we decide that God is there first and foremost to serve our will, and to aid our lives on our terms? Are we evangelizing or are we being anti-evangelized? To what degree have we mistaken the assimilation by paganism for legitimate inculturation, that is, the adaptation of Christian culture to the ‘language’ of the surrounding non-Christian culture?”

The very essence of liberty is religious freedom, that is, the freedom of the children of God without which political rights mean very little. St. Peter exhorts, “Be free, yet without using freedom as a pretext for evil, but as slaves of God.” (1 Pt. 2:16) So many Americans it would now seem have adopted a quite distorted sense of religious liberty as being the supremacy of individual conscience, an attitude which when widely diffused produces subjectivism, moral relativism, and ultimately religious and social anarchy. Imagine what President Washington would have thought of ‘abortion rights,’ ‘gay marriage,’ or ‘transgenderism.’ I daresay that he would never have considered such abuses as legitimate fruits of freedom.

Freedom is somewhat like a loaded gun with no safety. One needs to aim carefully and sparingly and to select targets prudently lest disaster ensues. Similarly, what passes for freedom today more closely resembles diabolical disorientation ~ men passing as women and vice versa, marriage and family redefined, surrogacy and IVF lauded even as epic scourges of drug and pornography addiction abound, child trafficking and blatant war crimes committed with impunity using our tax dollars. Our elected authorities become silent as the grave on such matters of grave importance because they hold a false notion of freedom un-tethered from responsibility. The false assumption that humans are capable of unilaterally deciding what is good and what is evil began when the ‘rights of man’ were allowed to eclipse the ‘rights of God.’ But it is the role and sacred duty of Religion to defend first the rights of God. This is where the modern concept of religious liberty is failing.

Continue reading

Reflections on Pope Leo XIV

We’ve had a new pope for exactly two weeks now and from comments I am seeing online, some are elated while others are positively dismayed by the choice of Robert Cardinal Prevost as the new Vicar of Christ. My first reaction was a rather personal one ~ for the first time in my life there is a pope sitting on the throne of St. Peter who is younger than I am! That in itself is a lot to digest. Popes were supposed to be old guys and suddenly this “youngster” (to me) is prancing around in the white robes and skullcap of the Petrine office. It feels like that moment when you meet your new doctor for the first time and you realize, “He looks like a teenager!”

But now that I have overcome the initial unsettling wave of chronological dysphoria, I am ready take a more balanced, objective view of the situation. Leo XIV is not only the first pope younger than myself but he is also the first American pope, Chicago born and bred, something that was considered unthinkable even a year ago. The cardinals in conclave were willing to pursue this pragmatic option in my opinion because the scandal plagued Vatican finances are in such a disheveled state that they needed someone able to tap more easily into our vast national wealth. That is not a criticism but merely an observation. Fiscally, the Vatican has its back to the wall, a problem which the Bergoglian papacy only exacerbated by purposely alienating American Catholics, who also happen to be the Vatican’s largest donor class. The hope is that Leo, as an American, can right the ship.

From the moment he first appeared on the Loggia wearing the traditional papal robes of office Leo appeared to be a conciliator. But what most struck many was his choice in taking the name Leo XIV, a clear sign that he envisions a dramatic change in direction for the Church after 12 chaotic years of “Francis the agitator.” This Leo’s predecessor, Pope Leo XIII, likewise stepped into a supercharged time of crisis for the Church back in 1878, as it came under full frontal assault by Freemasonry. The Industrial Revolution was raging like a wildfire upending Christian civilization wherever it laid down smoke belching factories and massive urban slums. Leo responded with his great encyclical Rerum Novarum which afforded dignity to the workers yet defended the rights of property, threading a common sense course between the excesses of unrestrained corporate capitalism and the equally soul deadening mosh pit of Marxist socialism.

Continue reading