A Double Case of Stalemate

One of the things I have noticed for some time now is how trends and events in the Roman Catholic Church are reflective of, and roughly parallel to, trends found in the secular society, regardless of any rigid attempts to maintain Church and State in their separate pigeonholes. This phenomenon should not be surprising to any astute observer because the Church herself is a body politic which, in her human element, consists of the same ordinary and fallible men and women who in aggregate constitute civil society as well. Secular attitudes therefore are just as apt to be found among Churchmen as Christian viewpoints permeating the legal and social order to one degree or another. This inevitable cross-pollination has worked at times for the better, but sometimes to the Church’s detriment. Regardless, I would suspect that few today would deny that the trends over the past several generations have steered in a decisively ‘progressive’ direction in both spheres, whether Church or State. And it is those ‘left of center’ trends which have brought us to this present moment which I would describe as a stalemate, be it religious, social, or political.

For the United States this stalemate could be summed up in the current war against Iran, a conflict carelessly entered into with no popular support, no apparent long term strategy, and no clearly enunciated objectives other than to topple a government inimicable to one small client state, Israel. That goal having failed spectacularly, we now find American military assets in the Gulf region under siege, a looming global economic catastrophe due to the closure of the Persian Gulf, and a colossal blow struck to America’s credibility and prestige in the world. Nor does there seem to be any face saving exit from the debacle, this asymmetric war in which the weaker party, Iran, seems to hold all the strategic cards.

Thirty-five years ago, as the Cold War was ending, America seemed to be holding all the aces. We were the sole global superpower. We controlled banking and trade via the de facto global currency, the dollar. We had peacefully defeated the Soviet empire and the time seemed ripe to beat our swords into plow-shares for a dawning era of peace, trade, and prosperity. But in fact we did just the opposite. We doubled down under the influence of war-mongering neo-cons and continued beating our plow-shares into swords. We followed the same dreary path that the British colonial empire had blazed: military adventurism, resource extraction, and power projection by means of stealth, force, or deception. In the end Britain’s wars of avarice bankrupted the exhausted empire, so the Americans simply took on the British mantle and continued down the same futile pathway. That trek dragged us through conflicts in Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos, Iraq, Somalia, Bosnia, Afghanistan, Iraq (again), and a Ukraine proxy war. The result has been multiple failures and embarrassments.

Continue reading

Vatican II and the Traditional Roman Rite

October 11, 1962 is a day I well remember. It was the day Pope John XXIII opened the vaunted Second Vatican Council in Rome, but that is not why I remember it. October 11 was my parents’ silver wedding anniversary and our family held a joyous, and for me unforgettable, celebration of that momentous event. I was a ten year old product of a staunchly Catholic family just beginning the fifth grade in parochial school. My world was family, neighborhood, and St. Vincent de Paul parish where I had been baptized and received the sacraments. Though I was only dimly aware of it, in far off Italy the Pope and 3,000 bishops were assembled and talking excitedly about a new “springtime in the Church.”

At the time such a promise seemed plausible enough. After all Masses were packed every Sunday, Catholic schools were bursting at the seams, seminaries couldn’t handle all the new vocations – all attested to by relentless parish building campaigns. Religious communities were flourishing and missionaries around the world were making tremendous strides in bringing the Gospel into remote regions which had never been evangelized. In the United States the first ever Catholic president was bravely standing down the Soviets during the Cuban missile crisis. Among Catholics there was every reason for optimism. The Church had never been stronger or more sure of her divine mission, or so it appeared.

Ten years later a far different picture had emerged, that of a Church in crisis. Priests and religious were leaving their vocations in droves. Catechesis had fallen off a cliff along with Mass attendance. Seminaries were closing for lack of vocations even as the Pope himself was under siege by many of his own clergy for daring to restate the Church’s timeless teachings regarding openness to human life in Humanae Vitae. Catholics were struggling to adapt to a new, diluted Liturgy promulgated by that same Pontiff, Paul VI, and which seemed to be enervating Catholicism across the board. The Holy Mass somehow no longer felt as holy as it had been before 1962. The Council’s oft stated goal of a more active lay participation had instead manifested as restless boredom in the pews and indifference towards fulfilling one’s Sunday obligations.

Continue reading